Six measures of ‘good’ urbanism

 

Our highest priority in designing the city must be to make places that will resonate with human sense experience, and support social functioning. Yet, that will require a shift away from the Modern planning paradigm to the longstanding urban tradition that shapes cities according to physical, social and ecological human needs.

In Vancouver, when we speak about ‘urban design’. For example, when a project goes to the Urban Design Panel for review. However, what we are dealing with is Modern urbanism, rather than the longstanding tradition of urban design. We have argued here that Modern urbanism is bereft in one all important area: it has failed to produce any places of lasting value.

Focusing on just one aspect of ‘good’ urbanism, we list here several characteristics in the built form that are fundamental in shaping the human experience of place.

  1. Perimeter Block Massing
  2. Continuity of the streetwall
  3. Human scale
  4. Street aspect ratio
  5. Solar penetration
  6. Environmental performance of the street

Perimeter Block Massing
Perimeter block massing on city blocks presents a hard edge to the street side, and a soft middle to the block interior. Perimeter block massing aligns built form along the edge of the urban block resulting in the continuity of the street wall. By keeping the centre of the urban block free of buildings, and green, it creates an open block middle that we experience as a green space.

Continuity of the Streetwall
In order to achieve ‘the sense of place’—or definition of the street space—pairs of urban blocks must present a continuous streetwall along the full length of street. Provided that the streetwall breaks at regular intervals (measured as the scale of the urban block), and is not too high (measured as the street aspect ratio), the human experience of the street is greatly enhanced by the enclosing gesture of the continuity of the streetwall. In Vancouver, Water Street is the only street that meets this condition along its full length.

The Human Scale Principle
In order to achieve human scale in the experience of the street the height of the streetwall must be set in proportion to the width of the fronting street (below we will discuss this condition in relation to the urban room). We term this relationship the Street Aspect Ratio.

Street Aspect Ratio
Human sense perception is heightened in spaces with proportions that can be described by small, whole-number ratios such as: 1 : 1, 1 : 2, and 1 : 3. We experience spaces that present these ratios as having a high sense of enclosure. If aspect ratios in public spaces reach 1 : 6, or higher, then the “sense of place” is lost for the observer. Other considerations for aspect ratio include:

  1. Close to the equator, aspect ratios of 2 : 1 are common achieving passive cooling in shadowed streets.
  2. A row of closely spaced trees (about 20-feet apart) approximates the streetwall effect of a continuous row of buildings.
  3. As the street aspect ratio decreases, the dispersal of particulates, and emissions increases.

Solar Penetration
In Vancouver, between December and January, the angle of the sun in the sky at noon dips below 27° above the horizon. Thus, a street aspect ratio of 1 : 2 (tan 27°) will permit solar penetration to the sidewalk opposite 10 months of the year. A street aspect ratio of 1 : 3 (tan 18°) will allow full solar penetration year-round. Therefore, we recommend that street aspects ratios in Vancouver should fall within the following criteria:

  • 1 : 3 (minimum streetwall height: 33% of fronting street width); and
  • 1 : 2 (maximum streetwall height: 50% of fronting street width).
  • 1 : 4 (on residential streets: balancing density, with a reduced sense of enclosure).

© Lewis N. Villegas, Vancouver, February 2012.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Six measures of ‘good’ urbanism

  1. We conducted this study to show the alternative to the tower invading our historic district, and other neighbourhoods, including Chinatown. However, following on the HAHR process, it is hard to imagine that we can do much. Call your councillor. Talk to the property owners. Organize a letter writing campaign from the community, and show up at the public hearing.

    However, we have to recognize that the development community is geared up to put up towers in the neighbourhoods. And, that the City has not made the connection between transit implementation (BRT on Main, for example), street revitalization, and redevelopment on a lot by lot basis. In the case of Chinatown, the City has also not realized the advantage of treating it like a Gastown, or Granville Island, and financing a full revitalization of Pender, Keefer, and the Chinatown blocks on Main.

    Tower modernism is their solution.

  2. Thanks for your reply Lewis.
    I will follow your suggestions.
    Can I link to this blog post? I appreciate the 6 measures and would like to share.
    Let me know if you prefer that I don’t.

    I also want to thank you for the wonderful blog – I’m really enjoying following your activities.

  3. I am very interested in Chinatown. I feel that it is a critical part of the story of Vancouver. In 1891 the CPR started regular passenger service to China. And the rest, as they say, is history… Our history.

    Please use the materials in this blog to help you champion the cause of a Sustainable Vancouver. That’s what the SUN Network concept is all about.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s